S.No
|
Citation
|
Name of the Party
|
Subject Heading
|
1
|
2013
(3) ECS (74) (Guj-HC)(106 KB)
|
PSL Ltd
|
Statutory remedy of appeal to be
availed instead of filing the petition to the High Court directly
|
2
|
2013(1)
ECS (140) (Tri-Mum)(198 KB)
|
M/s Gammon India Ltd
|
In a taxing statute on
has to look merely at what is clearly said. There is no room for any
intendment. There is no equity about a tax. There is no presumption as to a
tax. Nothing is to be read in, nothing is to be implied. One can only look
fairly at the language used
|
3
|
2013
(1) ECS (98) (Tri-Mum)(230 KB)
|
M/s Lark Chemicals Pvt. Ltd
|
If a point has not been raised
before the adjudicating authority and has not been considered by the said
authority, it would be incorrect and inappropriate for the appellate
authority to give a finding thereon
|
4
|
2013(2)
ECS (131)(Tri-Mum)(211 KB)
|
Whirlpool of India Ltd
|
Tribunal has no power to review
its own order, however, modification of the order can be asked in the event
of "change in circumstances" as held in Baron International Ltd. Grey Worldwide
(I) Pvt. Ltd. Vs CST, Mumbai 2013 (2) ECS ( ) (Tri - Mum)
|
5
|
2012
(1) ECS (79 ) (Tri-Che)(220 KB)
|
M/s. Lumix
Export & Import
|
Demurrage and other incidental charges for
goods detained in the Customs area are required to be paid by the exporter
consignor even if such goods were illegally detained
|
6
|
2013(2)
ECS(121) (Tri-Mum)(106 KB)
|
M/s Interport
Logistics Pvt. Ltd
|
High Court of Kerala in the case
of Chellapan Vs. Additional Collector of Customs
1978 (2) ELT (J547) (Ker.) held that the methods indicated under Section 153
are alternative methods, any one of which could be attempted." [Para 5]
|
7
|
2013(4)
ECS (179) (Tri-Ahd)(192 KB)
|
M/s. Ojasvi
Marble & Granites Pvt. Ltd.
|
MOP will vary from time to time and also
depend upon the country of origin of goods.
|
8
|
2013(4)
ECS(125) (Tri-Mum)(418 KB)
|
Bharat Bijlee
Ltd.
|
After the project is completed,
the contracts have to be finalized under Regulation 7 so that the Revenue can
be satisfy that the terms and conditions of the
project imports have been complied with by the importer. If one-to-one
co-relation is not maintained, fulfilling of the condition regarding usage of
the imported product in a particular project cannot be established.
|
9
|
2014 (2) ECS (274) (Tri-Ahm)(192 KB)
|
M/s.
Indian Potash Limited
|
Once an
order of assessment is passed, the duty would be payable as per that order
unless the order of assessment has been reviewed under Section 28 and/ or
modified in an Appeal that Order stands.
|
10
|
2014 (2) ECS (279) (Tri-Kol)(182 KB)
|
M/s
SESA Goa Ltd
|
Taking
into consideration the dispute of applicability of FOB value or cum-duty
price can be done only when there is some data available in the implication
of duty.
|
11
|
2014 (2) ECS (282)
(Tri-Del)(120 KB)
|
M/s.
YKK (India) Pvt. Ltd
|
Royalty
is computable on the invoice price appearing on the sale of all products sold
by licensee during the royalty computation period
|
12
|
2014 (3)
ECS (1) (SC)(822 KB)
|
Anvar P.V.
|
Authentication of
electronic record:
Electronic evidence
to be authenticated by the certificate in terms of Section 65 B, without
which, the secondary evidence pertaining to that electronic record, is
inadmissible.
|
13
|
2014 (3)
ECS (20) (SC)(2.466 MB)
|
Kushalbhai Ratanbhai Rohit & Ors
|
Power to recall or
review the order before it is signed
Criminal offence
under Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - committed under the commission of appellant's duty-
recall/review of the Judgment in Criminal Cases- A Judge's responsibility is
very heavy, particularly, in a case where a man's life and liberty hang upon
his decision. Nothing can be left to chance or doubt or conjecture. One
cannot assume that the Judge would not have changed his mind before the
judgement become final.
|
14
|
2014 (4) ECS (265) (Tri-Ahd)
(135 MB)
|
M/s. Agro Canners
|
Redemption Fine: Readjudication of points already attained finalty -
The Commissioner has erred by readjudicating the points which had attained
finalty as no appeal had been filed
|
15
|
2014 (4) ECS (274) (Tri-Del)
(163 MB)
|
M/s. Kedia (Agencies) Pvt.
|
Procedural lapse: Amendment of Shipping Bills- Nothing was made
known to Customs authorities by the respondent at the time of export
as to the eligibility and permissibility of the benefit of the scheme
sought to govern the respondent. Plea of export under "VKGUY" scheme is belated.
|