S.No
|
Citation
|
Name of the Party
|
Subject Heading
|
1
|
2013
(1) ECS (95) (Tri-Mum)(181 KB)
|
Avesh Hanif Pitodia
|
The appellant not only mis-declared the value of the goods but also imported duplicate
goods bearing the brand name of well-known brands thereby contravening the
provisions of IPR (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007 and Foreign Trade (Regulations)
Rules, 1993
|
2
|
2012
(1) ECS (155) (Tri-Ban)(216 KB)
|
M/s. Samalkot
Power Ltd. and Others
|
Notification No. 21/2012 Cus and 49/2012 Cus :
Benefit of an exemption Notification
not placed before the bench at the time of argument, cannot be claimed by the applicant for rectification of
Mistake
|
3
|
2014
(2) ECS(109)(HC-Mad)(1.16 MB)
|
M/s. DCW Limited
|
DEPB Scheme: Levy and collection
of 2% Education Cess on import under DEPB Scheme.
Exemption of duties under the DEPB Scheme cannot be construed as absolute
exemption as the duty leviable on import under the
DEPB Scheme is paid by way of debit in the DEPB scrip.
|
4
|
2014 (3) ECS (235)
(Tri - Mum)(156 KB)
|
M/s. Ramky Infrastructure
Ltd.
|
Exemption under Notfn. 21/2002- Cus- The
machine in question does not satisfy the conditions laid down in the Notfn. Not eligible for exemption.
|
5
|
2014 (4) ECS (230) (Tri-Del)
(155 KB)
|
M/s. G.L. Litmus Events Pvt. Ltd.
|
Retrospective application of exemption notification - The exemption
being in the nature of exception is to be construed strictly at the stage of
determination whether the assessee falls within its terms or not and in case of doubt
or ambiguity the benefit of it must go to the state
but once a provisions found applicable to the assessee full effect must be given to it.
|